Donnellan: “Reference and Definite Descriptions”. TWO USES OF . sentence “ Keith asserted that Smith’s murderer is insane.” To capture the. Keith Donnellan, “Reference and Definite Descriptions”. Due Feb 13, by 10am; Points 5; Submitting a discussion post; Available after Feb 2, at 12am. Keith Donnellan, Joseph Almog, and Paolo Leonardi function is the referential use of definite description, in which the speaker uses it to refer to something.
|Published (Last):||6 May 2008|
|PDF File Size:||18.22 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
As Jacksonputs the idea:. Oxford Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to decinite the full text of books within the service. He talks of the thing that is “meant”; of something that the speaker has “in mind”. Stanford University Press, — You’ve already rated students with this rubric. According to Ludlow and Neale, it is implausible to think that all of these uses can be chalked up to semantic facts. These lectures were highly influential and marked the decline of Descriptivism’s popularity.
Meaning, Quantification, NecessityLondon: Byanalytic philosophers widely accepted a view regarding the ddscriptions that holds of proper names and that which they name which is known as descriptivism and attributed to Bertrand Russell.
Keith Donnellan, “Reference and Definite Descriptions”
The Existence Entailments of Definite Descriptions. Past, Present and FutureOxford: As we saw in section 4, the distinction between the proposition literally expressed and the proposition meant was not sufficient to account vefinite this ambivalence on our part.
As Donnellan notes in section V, this latter point qualifies the earlier one about presuppositions p.
But according to Ludlow and Segalif we combine this pragmatic distinction with the unified analysis of definite and indefinite descriptions there is something we can say about this last bit of residue. One interesting fact to observe here, is that as noted by Hewson ; 66—67 languages with articles and languages with robust case morphology are typically in complementary distribution.
But again we might consider collapsing the distinction between definite and indefinite descriptions here, and say that there is a single rule that interprets all descriptions—definite, indefinite, singular, plural, mass, or generic—as predicates.
What would count as independent evidence either for, or against, a domain-shift taking place?
Reference and Definite Descriptions
Thesis, Department of Philosophy, St. Searle; ff.
One might suggest that Donnellan is going even further in this direction. PragmaticsNew York: On Shell StructureLondon: See, for reterence, Geach ; section 39Wiggins42 ff. Ludlowhas argued that temporal and modal anaphora can be handled in a similar manner.
University of Minnesota Press, 6— Can these also be rejected? There is no unique sage plant in the minimal events.
Again we are ambivalent about the truth of what I say, and as Neale ; 91—93 observed, the distinction between the proposition literally expressed and the proposition meant allows us to understand why. Suppose, for example, that in some country there was a law that no person could hold public office if he considered it false that the Ruler of recerence Universe is wise. But notice also that in this case the existence claim is also not part of what is asserted. This is not surprising, given that pragmatics can involve sophisticated real world reasoning.
We take them all. Essays on Reference, Language, and Mind. It appears to be exactly the same phenomenon.
Reference and Definite Descriptions – Oxford Scholarship
Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use for details see www. The claim, however, is not that the definite determiner is functioning as a possessive. Science Logic and Mathematics.