Vladimir Jabotinsky: The Iron Wall – We and the Arabs (). It was inevitable that Jabotinsky would attract the attention of the leaders of the WZO. His journalism gave him tremendous mobility. In he. In Jabotinsky was elected to the Zionist Executive. . This, in a nutshell, was Jabotinsky’s policy regarding the Arab question: to erect an iron wall of Jewish.
|Published (Last):||6 September 2006|
|PDF File Size:||15.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.19 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Iron Wall (essay) – Wikipedia
This Israel-related article is a stub. Human society is built up on the basis of mutual advantage. Where they were at odds was over the timing jaboginsky the Zionist resort to force. In the interview, he went so far as to acknowledge that he had erred in his foreign policy views and actions for decades.
See, for example, Anita Shapira, Land and Power: In drawing up that programme, we had in mind not only the Jews, but all nations everywhere, and its basis is equality of rights. The editor of the paper is even willing to believe that the absorptive capacity of Eretz Israel is very great, and that it is possible to settle many Jews without affecting one Arab. Jabotinsky wrote in French and Hebrew and supervised the entire operation.
In the absence of a clear consensus, the settlement movement began to make headway, especially on the West Bank, the heart of the biblical Land of Israel. He grasped that the iron wall had achieved its primary purpose and that the remaining confrontational states, as well as the Palestinians, were ready to make peace with Israel based on mutual compromises.
The Iron Wall Revisited
The article concludes with a profession of faith that peaceful coexistence between Arabs and Jews in Palestine is possible, but only as a result of the construction of an impregnable wall. Self-determination means revision — such a revision of the distribution of the earth among the nations that those nations who have too much should have to give up some of it to those nations who have not enough or who have none, so that all should have some place on which to exercise their right of self-determination.
The Picture in Israel should negotiate withdrawal from the bulk of the West Bank, not as a favour to the Palestinians but as a huge favour to itself. Every indigenous people will resist alien settlers as long as they see any hope of ridding themselves of the danger of foreign settlement. The Palestinians do not pose a threat to Israel’s basic security; it is the other way round. It is impossible to build a country in a permanent state of war, but peace for us is a means.
So those who regard an accord with the Arabs as an indispensable condition of Zionism must admit to themselves today that this condition cannot be attained and hence that we must give up Zionism.
Ben-Gurion and the Iron Wall. Or of the Mandate? The ascension to power of the Young Turks rekindled all the old Zionist illusions of gaining their aspirations through patient work with the rulers at Constantinople, and their Political Bureau there worked hard.
The Oslo accord between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organisation PLO of was a major turning-point in the century-old history of the conflict over Palestine.
So why should a nation that is perfectly content with its isolation admit to its country even good neighbours in any considerable number? To that end, he persuaded U.
Since Ajbotinsky am one of those who helped to draft it, I am naturally not disposed to question the justice of the principles advocated there. During his historic trip to Jerusalem in NovemberEgyptian president Anwar Sadat made clear to his host that a purely bilateral peace deal was out of the question and that a solution had to be found for the Palestine problem in the form of national self-determination. Clearly, in this period they are interested in only one thing — that the Arabs not interfere with Jewish immigration.
There is no such precedent.
Iron Wall (essay)
It is only one of the two claimants who is obstinate: In the latter he undertook to withdraw Israeli troops from a further 13 percent of the West Bank in three redeployments, but he suspended the memorandum after a single redeployment to appease his right-wing coalition partners. But once again diplomacy was shunned and the men with the guns were ordered into action.
Like Sharon, Olmert was a lifelong supporter of greater Israel who only changed course after he realised that the demographic balance was jaboginsky inexorably in favour of the Palestinians. Menachem Begin, The Revolt, rev. Tauris,p. Sharon had nothing to offer the Palestinians on the political front. There is no misunderstanding. Both were disciples of Jabotinsky; both were dedicated to the Greater Israel project; both were suspicious of outside powers.
One of them says: It is not true; either Zionism is moral and just or it is immoral and unjust. After this introduction I can now get to the point. He wrote the essay after the British Colonial Secretary Winston Churchill prohibited Zionist settlement on the east bank of the Jordan Riverand formed the Zionist Revisionist party after writing it.
Not till then will they drop their extremist leaders, whose watchword is “Never! The Israeli Right thus provided both the paradigm for solving the conflict with the Palestinians, and the politicians who are unable or unwilling to implement it.