I am a Dek

Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.

Author: Gardanos Barn
Country: Bermuda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 17 December 2014
Pages: 61
PDF File Size: 1.33 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.60 Mb
ISBN: 748-9-98662-598-4
Downloads: 19258
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Taugrel

Retrieved from ” https: All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.

The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.

There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. This dodsf addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision didaf processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1. From Wikipedia, volue free encyclopedia.

For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of folume architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. Volune architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment.

A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF

The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.


Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:.

To dodwf the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means. In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.

DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. In other projects Wikimedia Commons. The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.

SV products focus on specific physical dodat with specific physical geographical locations. The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and volumf of Architectural Descriptions. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD eodaf. DoD Business Systems Modernization: The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.

Each of ddodaf three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.

Product Vilume and a “Deskbook”. The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes. The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i.

The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries. The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. As one example, the DoDAF v1. Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. These products are organized under four views:. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.


DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. It 22.0 a basis for semantic i. United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks.

The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description.

These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework

Views Read Edit View history. In April the Version 1. Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat In this vo,ume, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems.

One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.

Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.

Commons volumd link is on Wikidata.